Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Oil Critiques
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Old 02-04-2006, 10:18 AM   #21
Janet Kimantas Janet Kimantas is offline
Juried Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 233



No, I don't think I took you the wrong way. I meant ouch for those others! Don't worry, I knew you were saying something nice. I shoulda used a smilie.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2006, 03:21 PM   #22
Julie Deane Julie Deane is offline
Juried Member
 
Julie Deane's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Gainesville, GA
Posts: 1,298
Janet -

I believe I ordered the reducing lens online, either from Jerry's Artarama or www.aswexpress.com.

In just one or two years you will look back at your painting, look at your current ones and see how far you've come. The feedback here shows that the members of this forum believe in you.

We all have to put in our time and paint our miles of canvases.
__________________
Julie Deane
www.discerningeyeportraits.com
Member of Merit, Portrait Society of Atlanta
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2006, 04:48 PM   #23
Janet Kimantas Janet Kimantas is offline
Juried Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 233
Wow, Julie, what a sweet thing to say. Thank you. And I will look up that reducing lens and see if I can find something a little more local. Janet
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2006, 11:35 PM   #24
Michele Rushworth Michele Rushworth is offline
CAFE & BUSINESS MODERATOR
SOG Member
FT Professional
 
Michele Rushworth's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460
The problem lies in having too great a value range in any given area, as other artists have mentioned. You can really see it with this posterized Photoshop greyscale comparison. The photo, on the left, shows larger simpler areas of dark, medium and light values. The painting, on the right, shows those same areas broken up into too many value changes where they don't exist.

Moving back as you work, using a mirror, or perhaps that reducing gadget may help.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Michele Rushworth
www.michelerushworth.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2006, 10:03 AM   #25
Janet Kimantas Janet Kimantas is offline
Juried Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 233
Thanks Michele. I've actually got this painting going again in the WIP. Sort of boring, I suppose, but it's to give people a chance to prevent me making mistakes, rather than giving post-mortems! I'd love your input, and by the way I'm attempting to be very strict with my value this time. Janet
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 11:21 AM   #26
Sharon Knettell Sharon Knettell is offline
Approved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,730
Janet,

I know this is just adding to the pile.

I find this happens to my work when I have been working too exclusively from photographs. There is a tendency to get TOO CLOSE and see each feature individually.

Another problem is that we see each photograph as an opportunity to make a finished product instead of a work of art.

There are times we have to step back to square one and relearn the stuff they all too infrequently did not teach us even in the finest of art schools; mainly how to make form.

I would get the book, "The Practice and Science of Drawing", by Harold Speed, available on this web-site. It goes back to the basics, especially working in black and white before attempting form.

There is another thread on the Bargue method on this site. That is working again sight-size in monochrome from classcal forms.

These are invaluable tools in the foundation of really fine figurative work.

If you are serious about becoming a portrait artist, endlessly reproducing photographs is not the way to go. The competition is stiff and numerous. The best gift you can give yourself is a good foundation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 05:00 PM   #27
Janet Kimantas Janet Kimantas is offline
Juried Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 233
Sharon,

Everything you said is true, and I've only just gotten to the point where I can really appreciate it's meaning for me right now. I've had a sneaking feeling since the New Year that in order to go forward, I will have to go back first. Thank you, Janet
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2006, 05:28 PM   #28
Sharon Knettell Sharon Knettell is offline
Approved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,730
Janet,

I am trying to save you the time I wasted following the very same path. It is not a step backward, but a step forward.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2006, 08:58 AM   #29
Janet Kimantas Janet Kimantas is offline
Juried Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 233
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharon Knettell
Janet,

I am trying to save you the time I wasted following the very same path. It is not a step backward, but a step forward.
That's a much better way of putting it!
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Topic Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Before posting for critique (inlcuding Resource Photo Critiques) Cynthia Daniel Posting Guidelines & Proper Conduct 0 11-18-2002 03:05 AM
Next Critique Session Anne Hall Upcoming Events & Announcements 0 02-27-2002 01:59 PM

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.