Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Cafe Guerbois Discussions - Moderator: Michele Rushworth
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


 
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-26-2005, 07:14 PM   #15
Sharon Knettell Sharon Knettell is offline
Approved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,730
We have to make a discernment here of art that is done for a living, for profit, or for ones self expression.

I have spoken about the repetitive nature of the little girls in white dresses. It is lucrative no doubt, but I won't go there right now.

I think an artist should paint what he truly knows and loves. He should develop and explore what he has to say, what he means to communicate, not endless genre paintings and landscapes of other cultures.The Burdick renderings are a superficial record of a culture he obviously neither knows or understands deeply and done for his own profit. They just as well could be paintings of Laplanders or Eskimos. It is the quaintness not the content that is important. They are simply facile renderings of photos taken in situ, illustrations. They are derivative and trite. The photographs would have served as well, unless paint handling is a major criteria in judging artistic merit.

The Tibetan culture is an extremely sophisticated one, which is belied by these paintings of the local peasants. Their religion and philosophy is being studied in the major universities of the West. Herbert Benson of Havard published a groundbreaking book called "The Relaxation Response" based on his work with Tibetan Lamas. As matter of fact the traditional form of art , the thanka painting is not done for profit. It is done and commissioned for religious purposes only. They should never be sold, though they are in the West.

For really evocative and sensitive pictures of Tibetan culture I suggest you look to the photographs of Mathieu Ricard.

A great deal of Asian art came into Europe in the latter part of the 19th century. Intelligent artists like Mary Cassatt and Gauguin among other assimilated the inherent flatness of the Japanese and Chinese work into their own. It was not an Asian pastiche, but an intelligent adaptation of another culture vis-a-vis their own artistic explorations.

As to portraiture, it is consiously done for money. There is no disguise, it is very straightforward, some of it achieves more, some does not.
  Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Topic Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Higher thoughts and prayer request. Elizabeth Schott Member News 58 10-21-2004 12:13 AM
Sargent thoughts Timothy C. Tyler Exercises and Challenges 9 10-19-2003 12:36 AM
Thoughts about donating artwork to a corporation. Anthony Emmolo Business, Marketing & PR 7 08-19-2002 12:45 PM
Interested in your thoughts Vickie Saadi Old Master Copy Critiques 2 07-27-2002 10:27 PM

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.