Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Oil Critiques
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Closed Topic
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Old 03-02-2005, 01:55 AM   #1
Marvin Mattelson Marvin Mattelson is offline
SOG Member
FT Professional
'04 Merit Award PSA
'04 Best Portfolio PSA
'03 Honors Artists Magazine
'01 Second Prize ASOPA
Perm. Collection- Ntl. Portrait Gallery
Perm. Collection- Met
Leads Workshops
 
Marvin Mattelson's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Location: Great Neck, NY
Posts: 1,093



John I just want to clarify that the Reilly palette is Cadmium based. His palette is arranged in three rows, one for neutrals, one based on Cadmium Orange and one based on Cadmium Red. I took Reilly's value based arrangement and substituted his cadmiums for my earth tones. His palette is capable of far greater chromatic intensities than I feel are necessary to paint flesh while mine covers a wider range of hues.

Many artists prior to Reilly used a set up which featured color strings arranged by value. DaVinci and Bouguereau are but two.
__________________
Marvin Mattelson
http://www.fineartportrait.com
[email protected]
 
Old 03-02-2005, 02:18 AM   #2
Cynthia Daniel Cynthia Daniel is offline
SOG & FORUM OWNER
 
Cynthia Daniel's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 2,129
Send a message via ICQ to Cynthia Daniel Send a message via AIM to Cynthia Daniel Send a message via MSN to Cynthia Daniel Send a message via Yahoo to Cynthia Daniel
Well said, Jean. I just finished (unfortunately), having to rebuild my main computer system due to Windows corruption and a crash. Thank goodness I lost no data. But, in the process of deciding the best approach to handling my situation, there were many different opinions, all convinced they were utterly right. My head was in a spin. But, in the end, I took all the information I had collected and made my choice - the choice that felt best to me. Just like each individual artist will make their choices as to their methods in the end.

In art, seems to me that it's the end-product that the consumer cares about. Does the art touch them, does it make them want to buy it? I doubt that they care much about cads or not. Bottom line is, there are different methods and each artist adopts the method they feel right about or comfortable with. There are no absolutes and no amount of Marvin or Tim trying to convince the other will ever change the other's views.

Thank you Tim and Marvin for giving our members a chance to learn about different methods. You're both right - for yourself and for those that love your art. So, please, each present your methods as you like - there's something here for all to learn - but, perhaps each of you should start a thread on your own method and the other keep out of that thread.
__________________
Cynthia Daniel, Owner of Forum & Stroke of Genius

www.PortraitArtist.com
 
Closed Topic


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Topic Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Direct painting versus glazing Marvin Mattelson Techniques, Tips, and Tools 11 11-22-2002 06:31 PM

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.