Portrait Artist Forum    

Go Back   Portrait Artist Forum > Digital cameras


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic Display Modes
Old 01-10-2005, 04:28 PM   #1
Michele Rushworth Michele Rushworth is offline
CAFE & BUSINESS MODERATOR
SOG Member
FT Professional
 
Michele Rushworth's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460



Jimmie, thanks for posting those hands with the color adjustments. I can easily do the same adjustments using curves and color balance in Photoshop though. It's pretty fast too. For now I think I'll stick with the JPEG file formats and Photoshop.

Especially if, as Holly said, the RAW files take much longer to write to memory than JPEG. I want to be able to shoot five quick frames of a wiggly child and don't want to wait even two seconds before I could push the shutter again.

Also, I understand what you mean, Jimmy, about the lack of sharp focus in "low" light. I photographed a girl in a chair yesterday right next to a big window, and used a tripod. She was sitting fairly still. It was a cloudy day but I thought I had plenty of light. I used the Auto ISO function so I have no idea what ISO the camera thought would be best. The shots came out a bit fuzzy and grainy, even the arm of chair, which surprised me.

A few weeks ago I photographed two VERY wiggly kids, no tripod, another cloudy day (hey, it's winter in the Northwest!) but we were outdoors, so there was lots more light. The shots came out much sharper.
__________________
Michele Rushworth
www.michelerushworth.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2005, 05:20 PM   #2
Holly Snyder Holly Snyder is offline
Juried Member
 
Holly Snyder's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Safety Harbor, FL
Posts: 231
Thanks for posting the images Jimmie. As Michele said, It seems to me that Photoshop CS could do the same thing with curves. But with the Photoshop Elements that I have, I have to adjust the red, green and blue individually which definitely takes a little work. Is the resolution/detail quality a lot better with the raw files over the jpgs?
__________________
Holly Snyder-Samson
www.artsci.us
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2005, 06:34 PM   #3
Jimmie Arroyo Jimmie Arroyo is offline
Juried Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 671
Michele, you definitely know more Photoshop than I do. I used to do the individual colors myself as Holly just described, but never got it as good as (or as easy) the Capture program. I guess I never really got that deep into it because I was doing graphite drawings anyway. As long as the contrast was good, I was good to go. The Capture program puts it in plain english, very straight foward.

Holly, again, since I did mainly graphite work, I would'nt be experienced enough to tell you if it'll make a difference. The quality is better, better enough to make a difference as reference? I don't know. Marvin uses the RAW setting, don't know if all the time. I'll PM him to see if he has time to pop in and give better advice.
__________________
"Lord, grant that I may always desire more than I can accomplish"-Michelangelo

jimmie arroyo
www.jgarroyo.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2005, 08:11 PM   #4
Marvin Mattelson Marvin Mattelson is offline
SOG Member
FT Professional
'04 Merit Award PSA
'04 Best Portfolio PSA
'03 Honors Artists Magazine
'01 Second Prize ASOPA
Perm. Collection- Ntl. Portrait Gallery
Perm. Collection- Met
Leads Workshops
 
Marvin Mattelson's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Location: Great Neck, NY
Posts: 1,093
Hi Y'all,

Can you tell I'm back from Atlanta? Ok Jimmy I'm chiming in. The raw file, called NEF by Nikon, contains far more info than a jpg ever could. First of all it's 16 bits which means it has a geometrically increased amount of information in each pixel. I believe hundreds if not thousands more. When applying a curve in Photoshop certain data gets tossed. However in the raw format all the data is retained. The alterations to the image are attached and not embeded.

Photoshop has a raw converter which I'm currently experimenting with. I'm reading a book by Bruce Frasier on the subject.

Gotta run now, but I'll be updating this thread.
__________________
Marvin Mattelson
http://www.fineartportrait.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2005, 11:25 PM   #5
Marvin Mattelson Marvin Mattelson is offline
SOG Member
FT Professional
'04 Merit Award PSA
'04 Best Portfolio PSA
'03 Honors Artists Magazine
'01 Second Prize ASOPA
Perm. Collection- Ntl. Portrait Gallery
Perm. Collection- Met
Leads Workshops
 
Marvin Mattelson's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Location: Great Neck, NY
Posts: 1,093
I'm back!

One of the interesting things about the Photoshop camera raw plug-in is that you have the ability to rescue some clipped highlights and shadows that in a jpg appear to be void of detail. Sometimes this can spell the difference between a good and unusable image.

The advantage of having your image edited in Raw is that there are many fine tunings available that don't exist in Photoshop. Also in the Photoshop raw plug-in you also have the ability to batch process and review images without actually having to open them.

There is a reason that the top pros shoot raw. It offers much greater flexibility. I back-up my Raw images on Cd's. It's like archiving one's negatives.

One thing I really like about the Nikon Capture program is that it allows you to upload custom curves to the camera. It's pretty awesome.
__________________
Marvin Mattelson
http://www.fineartportrait.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2005, 10:59 AM   #6
Holly Snyder Holly Snyder is offline
Juried Member
 
Holly Snyder's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: Safety Harbor, FL
Posts: 231
Welcome back Marvin!

Is the Photoshop raw plug-in an extra cost module?

I think the low-cost Photoshop Elements v.3 also has raw image manipulation now, but of course not the functionality of CS.

That's good to know that you can get more information out of the highlights and shadows with raw. If you enlarge the same raw and jpg image side-by-side, do you see more detail, range of coloring, values etc in the raw, to the extent that it would make a difference to paint from?

How have you found the curves to be useful? Do you use curves when you have the exact same lighting setup from model to model?

You may not want to answer this, as I can probably come up with even more questions based on your answers...

Holly
__________________
Holly Snyder-Samson
www.artsci.us
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2005, 01:28 PM   #7
Marvin Mattelson Marvin Mattelson is offline
SOG Member
FT Professional
'04 Merit Award PSA
'04 Best Portfolio PSA
'03 Honors Artists Magazine
'01 Second Prize ASOPA
Perm. Collection- Ntl. Portrait Gallery
Perm. Collection- Met
Leads Workshops
 
Marvin Mattelson's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Location: Great Neck, NY
Posts: 1,093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holly Snyder
Is the Photoshop raw plug-in an extra cost module?
No. It comes with the CS version. You can download the update on Adobe's site.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Holly Snyder
If you enlarge the same raw and jpg image side-by-side, do you see more detail, range of coloring, values etc in the raw, to the extent that it would make a difference to paint from?
They would look the same until you made the adjustments. Yes it would make a difference.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Holly Snyder
How have you found the curves to be useful? Do you use curves when you have the exact same lighting setup from model to model?
I use a curve I found on the Internet called the "white wedding dress curve" which really brings out the tonal details in the lights. It was created by a wedding photographer.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Holly Snyder
You may not want to answer this, as I can probably come up with even more questions based on your answers...
Who'da thunk it! ;-)
__________________
Marvin Mattelson
http://www.fineartportrait.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Topic Tools Search this Topic
Search this Topic:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Topics
Thread Topic Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ND70 Lenses John Reidy Digital cameras 10 01-03-2005 06:00 PM

 

Make a Donation



Support the Forum by making a donation or ordering on Amazon through our search or book links..







All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.