 |
04-12-2005, 11:50 PM
|
#1
|
Associate Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Toowoomba, Australia
Posts: 355
|
Janeen
This is my first attempt at taking resource photos. I have been reading everyone's posts and I think? I have captured a good one to work from.
I am itching to do a painting of my friend Janeen. She came over the other day to play me her new song. I just had to grab the camera and take a shot.
I like the idea of a keeping the cool background with the warm colours for the flesh and guitar. Is it suitable to start working on it?
Here is the cropped version and the full length - are any of these suitable?
|
|
|
04-13-2005, 12:17 AM
|
#2
|
SOG Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Southboro, MA
Posts: 1,028
|
Ngaire,
The images posted are so tiny, it's hard to see what you've actually got there. Any chance you could post them bigger?
|
|
|
04-13-2005, 05:21 AM
|
#3
|
Associate Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Toowoomba, Australia
Posts: 355
|
Terri I have made it a little bigger, but I seem to go over the 100kb. I am still learning how to do it. I did it at 72 dpi. When I went larger the kb's went up to 12000. How do you guys get bigger without going up in Kb's? I read Cynthia's post about images and it is under 600 x 400
|
|
|
04-13-2005, 07:56 AM
|
#4
|
Juried Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Gainesville, GA
Posts: 1,298
|
Sizing
Hi Ngaire -
It only allows 400 wide, so if you have a long photo, it reduces everything accordingly.
|
|
|
04-13-2005, 08:19 AM
|
#5
|
Juried Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Location: High Peak Derbyshire UK
Posts: 106
|
I have the same problem, I get around it by resizing (pixelwise) in Irfanview (free off the web) or photoshop, or anything else. Then saving it and opening with Paint and saving again.
For some reason opening and saving again in Paint compresses the kb dramatically without loosing definition. I would do the whole process in Paint but there is no way of telling it exactly what pixel size you want to resize to.
It's probably a long winded way about it but it works really well for me
Carolyn
|
|
|
04-13-2005, 01:56 PM
|
#6
|
CAFE & BUSINESS MODERATOR SOG Member FT Professional
Joined: Jul 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,460
|
Sorry to say it, Ngaire, but personally, I wouldn't paint from these photos. The biggest issue I see is that the light is very frontal -- was the flash turned on? If you've read through the photography threads you've probably seen many artists suggest that the first step is to turn the flash off and pose the model near a window so there's natural light coming from slightly off to one side. The lighting in these photos has also given you oddly pink coloring to the skintones too.
The second issue I have with these photos is that you can't see the model's face.
And finally the angles of the limbs seem very awkward to me. It reminds me a bit of Picasso's blue man with a guitar, which you may love, but isn't the direction I'd go in for a traditional portrait.
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing this Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 AM.
|