|
Not putting you off, but I don't have the expertise to answer your question, Tito, other than to say that I get fantastic images with my Sony Cybershot (bit of a dinosaur now, though with a Carl Zeiss lens), with a full range of values, and without either omission or clustering of intermediate values. There are so many variables that remain, even in these point-and-shoot times, that I doubt anyone would say across the board that digital trumps SLR for capturing intermediate values. Perhaps Bill Whitaker or Tim Tyler (or other digital camera wizards) will have some more insight into this.
|