Thread: O
View Single Post
Old 10-08-2007, 10:56 AM   #18
Marvin Mattelson Marvin Mattelson is offline
SOG Member
FT Professional
'04 Merit Award PSA
'04 Best Portfolio PSA
'03 Honors Artists Magazine
'01 Second Prize ASOPA
Perm. Collection- Ntl. Portrait Gallery
Perm. Collection- Met
Leads Workshops
 
Marvin Mattelson's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Location: Great Neck, NY
Posts: 1,093
Steven, you had me at "you've outdone yourself." Then I read further.

Perhaps I should have stated that, in my opinion, those who aspire to be great portrait artists are rebels. A rebel is someone who questions the status quo and looks for better answers. You can't achieve greatness by doing what every one else does. Lucien Freud is not a rebel, he's an anarchist. Bad example. Nelson Shanks, who happens to be at the top of the current heap, is quite contentious. I don't agree with some of his ideas but I applaud his efforts to shake things up.

The point here being that the gist of this thread is, "why is the forum participation dwindling." I'm offering my point of view. Long winded diatribes in defense of the forum aren't going to put fannies in the seats. At least I have the guts to put out a point of view, be it right or wrong. What are your suggestions for improving participation, Steven?

Regarding moderators, their job is to moderate. Umpires at a baseball game may be lifelong fans of a team they are officiating but their job demands objectivity and a setting aside of personal bias and grudges.

As a poster my job is to state my point of view. My agenda is to open up the eyes of others with the end goal of bettering the lot for all of us. As an educator and a working portrait artist I say to educate others makes things better for all. Ignorance isn't bliss, it's servitude.

I see many artists here and at the conferences buying into a culture of mediocrity because they can't even fathom there can be more out there. Read Philip Hales book on Vermeer, written almost 100 years ago, and see what the great Boston artists felt about painting.

Paxton was actually quite chippy and his student Gammel felt in the long run it hurt him. I understand exactly where Paxton was coming from. When certain commonly accepted practices and ideas are never questioned it can become quite maddening, especially to those who can see that the emperor is indeed naked.

Reading the Hale book was very eye opening. They knock many of the biggies of representational art. Reading this book has encouraged me to speak my mind. My agenda is to speak for the greater good.

How about if some of those of you who don't normally post chime in here.
__________________
Marvin Mattelson
http://www.fineartportrait.com
[email protected]
  Reply With Quote