Quote:
|
Which does not mean in any way that background or negative space is the third element--I am of the opinion that an element in a painting has to be a "positive", actual element.
|
Carlos,
I'm not sure I understand your meaning completely. Maybe it's just a matter of semantics. If we are studying the relationship of shapes and masses isn't one shape just as good as another? Are you distinguishing the term element from shape or mass? If you believe, as you stated, that your first example would be much weaker without the vacuum/shape to the right, then can't we accept it as a compositional element?
I agree that when the "elements" are reduced to the absolute minimum this is when we are put to the test.
Similar to your example Carlos, a more contemporary painting by Carol Katchen.