Languor (full figure)
 

This is the full version of the painting discussed here.

I know this section says "no critiques" but go ahead and let me know what you think about this painting. I'm discovering that the "nude genre" has its own pitfalls, whether an artist is painting them with a view to selling them or simply as anatomy exercises to keep hanging around the studio.

"Languor"
oil on panel (ABS), 48" x 30"

Hot diggety dog! Linda!

The first thing that I love about this is that it is a contemporary painting of a contemporary woman. No flower baskets and tripping through the heather.

The mood and the skin tones are beautiful and the content thoughtful.

I also like the cool simplicity and elegance of it.

I went back to my latest nascent oeuvre and after seeing yours; mine looks like a Degas pastiche as envisioned by Mary Poppins of Shirley Temple.

At the moment, we do have a Nudes Critiques section Linda. As you choose.

Everything works here. Beautifully done, composition, pose, model, colors etc.!

Beautiful blond colors. Everything is fine.

Reminds me about Turners late pictures, that I

I love this Linda. I went to your website to see the whole thing back when you posted the head in Unveilings. I've gone back to view it often. I really like how relaxed and comfortable the subject looks. I also really like the other seated nude you have on your site.

I am very interested in hearing about those "pitfalls" you mentioned above. Could you explain further what pits you fell into?

Thanks,

Gorgeous!

I am lucky enough to have seen this original, and the color is both lush and subtle, not so easy to co-exist. Can youpost more detaiils?

Thanks for this great contribution to the new section.

Cynthia, I don't need as much help with this one - it's been done for a while and I can't stand the thought of going back to it - as I do with my next one.

Sharon, your current project sounds intriging but I'll bet you're wrong about the Shirley Temple allusion.

Janel, it seems to me that you have to have a certain amount of either passivity or detachment in the nude's manner in order for he/she to be "presentable". So it seems to me, on one hand, that you have to turn the gaze or the face, or both, away from the viewer. (Look how much trouble Manet got into with "Olympia".) Additionally you have to subdue the painterly line and emphasize the volume (Ingres) or emphasize the painterly line and subdue the volume (give me a minute to think about this one). If you have an energetic line and lush volume you get something that borders on vulgar, or at least something that makes people uncomfortable.

It's okay to make people uncomfortable, or at least it's okay with me for art to make people uncomfortable, but that's not within the scope of "classic nude", and anyway I'm not trying to make people uncomfortable.

That's my first problem. The second problem is that this painting is just too large and demands too much attention.

My third problem is that I started painting nudes to learn anatomy and the most interesting part for me so far has been painting skin, which is different from painting "anatomy".

Jimmie, Allan and Chris, thank you for your kind comments!

Just beautiful Linda! The colors, the subtlety of the flesh tones, everything. I especially like how you captured the warm pink, almost translucentness of her fingers. . . and the natural relaxed-ness of her pose.

Was this painted from life?

Yep, it's sure a lot more skin than your regular head-and-hands portrait.

Linda, you already know how much I like this piece. The "sensuous line", as it were, need not be provocative as much as evocative. Here, the sense of "languor" is certainly evoked. As I'd mentioned to you before - the most sensual aspect in this piece stems from what is not revealed as opposed to what is. The piano shawl itself is a sensual, flowing object, and is an integral part of this work, as opposed to a mere prop.

I've only seen a few Sanden and Schmid nudes, but they seem to fall into the more painterly/less volume category (off the top of my head). Shanks' nudes are very engaging: direct gazes with energetic lines & very volumetric - but to me they convey more of a sense of character along the lines of a portrait. But then you have to keep in mind that this is what I've tried to go for in my figurative work, so it's really in the eye of the beholder.

I don't think there's a standard formula for an "inoffensive nude", meaning that, if someone wants to find something offensive in it, they will find it no matter how conservative the piece. Don't be put off by those who may have hangups about the human body, or piano shawls for that matter ;)

To a Skylark

Percy Bysshe Shelley

HAIL to thee, blithe Spirit!
Bird thou never wert,
That from heaven, or near it,
Pourest thy full heart
In profuse strains of unpremeditated art

With thy clear keen joyance
LANGUOR cannot be:
Shadow of annoyance
Never came near thee:
Thou lovest; but ne

Linda,

You know I think this is gorgeous - I saw it awhile back when you first finished. I wish I could see this one in person like Chris has! The painting is wonderful and the pose is engaging.

I love this painting, Linda!

There is a LANGUOR of the Life
More imminent than Pain -
'Tis Pain's successor - when the Soul
Has suffered all it can - A drowsiness diffuses -
A dimness like a Fog
Envelops Consciousness -
As Mists - obliterate a Crag. The Surgeon does not blanch at pain
His habit is severe -
But tell Him that it ceased to feel -
The Creature lying there - And he will tell you - skill is late -
A Mightier than He -
Has ministerd before Him -
There's no Vitality.

Emily Dickinson

Dear Linda,

This is such a decisive, strong, and poetic painting. The simple harmonious color theme gives clarity to the message of this highly original pose. This lovely figure beckons us to join her and reflect upon those challenges and tribulations we all face in life. I love crisp handling of this painting. It's a worthy, thoughtful, and wholesome addition to this new section of nudes. I'm glad we can see her as a complete and whole person now.

Garth

Linda in the nicest way... you have such a way with women! Beautiful!

I second Garth here, on this being a worthy addition to the nude section. I'm so glad to see this posted in full, it's a beautiful painting Linda.

Jean

Terri, I sketched her face on paper, took some photos, and realized after I took the photos that I was getting some kind of photo distortion no matter how far away I placed my camera or what zoom I used. When I say 'distortion' I mean that she just didn't look the way I saw her with my eye - the photos tended to drain the S-curve energy I saw in the pose. So I sat down and read everything I could find about figure perspective. Basically, what you want to do is establish an eye level and look up at her head and hands and down at her feet. (I went to several museums last year and sketched lots of full-sized figurative works and confirmed for myself that this is what a lot of artists did.) I ended up reshooting the foot with another model and wrapped the shawl over Half Nelson, my stuffed long underwear model (I do this a lot) to get some life practice in with fabric folds. Sorry to be so long-winded.

Many thanks to everyone, including Percy, for the kind remarks - they are much appreciated.